Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Sri Lanka Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,166,879 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Sri Lanka. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 14.0 Immigrants from Sri Lanka.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($103,534 compared to $120,263, a difference of 16.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,173 compared to $119,094, a difference of 15.4%), and median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $63,099, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $54,512, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $44,161, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 26.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.60%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.1%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.33%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 61.1%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 40.1%), and master's degree (14.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Sri Lanka communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.6%).