Immigrants from Congo 2 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,104,745 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 52.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.3% in percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Congo and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Congo influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available within an area, or if Immigrants from Congo simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by 2 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Immigrants from France (52.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Colombia (52.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Pima (52.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Honduran (52.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Ireland (52.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	2 or more Vehicles in Household
Central American Indians	0.6 /100 \| #258	Tragic 52.5%
Alsatians	0.6 /100 \| #259	Tragic 52.5%
Immigrants from Bahamas	0.5 /100 \| #260	Tragic 52.5%
Immigrants from Australia	0.5 /100 \| #261	Tragic 52.4%
Immigrants from Northern Africa	0.4 /100 \| #262	Tragic 52.3%
Immigrants from Southern Europe	0.4 /100 \| #263	Tragic 52.3%
Immigrants from Latvia	0.4 /100 \| #264	Tragic 52.2%
Immigrants from Congo	0.3 /100 \| #265	Tragic 52.1%
Immigrants from France	0.2 /100 \| #266	Tragic 52.0%
Immigrants from Colombia	0.2 /100 \| #267	Tragic 52.0%
Pima	0.2 /100 \| #268	Tragic 52.0%
Hondurans	0.2 /100 \| #269	Tragic 52.0%
Immigrants from Ireland	0.2 /100 \| #270	Tragic 52.0%
South Americans	0.2 /100 \| #271	Tragic 51.9%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.2 /100 \| #272	Tragic 51.9%

Immigrants from Congo 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Congo Data	2 or more Vehicles in Household Data
Minimum	0.0062%	19.4%
Maximum	7.4%	79.0%
Range	7.4%	59.6%
Mean	0.78%	51.4%
Median	0.59%	51.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	0.29%	47.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	0.97%	57.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	0.68%	10.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	0.95%	9.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	0.94%	9.6%

Correlation Details

Immigrants from Congo Percentile	Sample Size	2 or more Vehicles in Household
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0062%	37,721,903	39.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.023%	14,273,728	54.2%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.036%	7,808,956	52.8%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054%	7,580,812	52.9%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.069%	3,537,633	50.9%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.084%	3,247,218	54.5%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.099%	1,389,318	50.0%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12%	1,443,078	51.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13%	722,416	56.6%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14%	2,336,142	51.5%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16%	2,348,236	57.0%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18%	358,173	50.9%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19%	291,198	57.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21%	1,898,543	51.1%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22%	434,808	60.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24%	760,186	51.0%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25%	496,880	53.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27%	585,341	49.0%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28%	531,836	58.8%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30%	401,793	47.2%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31%	383,162	54.8%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33%	213,823	55.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.35%	286,907	51.2%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36%	146,758	44.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38%	159,165	46.8%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40%	191,448	47.8%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41%	123,241	57.2%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42%	101,543	58.4%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44%	39,083	66.3%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45%	28,970	45.6%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47%	135,564	56.2%
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48%	179,621	58.7%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.50%	9,536	73.4%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51%	22,546	51.8%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53%	131,929	55.2%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55%	27,636	52.3%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56%	94,019	51.0%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58%	27,652	62.4%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60%	38,225	36.2%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62%	71,872	49.4%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64%	119,806	52.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66%	24,398	60.8%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67%	69,456	51.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68%	89,464	58.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70%	63,508	59.3%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74%	37,809	45.4%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75%	60,937	43.7%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76%	96,559	44.2%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78%	82,734	52.4%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80%	91,037	52.0%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83%	26,837	66.3%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.86%	92,643	44.0%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.88%	56,935	48.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89%	27,865	49.7%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90%	45,419	58.7%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93%	9,217	64.6%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96%	90,227	48.5%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97%	11,081	43.7%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01%	43,653	43.6%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03%	64,713	57.2%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04%	12,355	37.0%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18%	54,017	49.8%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25%	40,527	33.7%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26%	80,672	57.0%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28%	24,892	32.3%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31%	13,510	69.5%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34%	14,363	49.4%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40%	38,441	58.3%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41%	13,295	33.6%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43%	7,666	19.4%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51%	2,912	36.0%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76%	2,846	39.2%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82%	1,483	32.5%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55%	1,885	56.9%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79%	5,876	54.5%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.42%	4,809	79.0%

Immigrants from Congo 2 or more Vehicles in Household

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo 2 or more Vehicles in HouseholdTragic

Immigrants from Congo 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Congo by 2 or more Vehicles in Household

Immigrants from Congo 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Immigrants from Congo 2 or more Vehicles in Household
Tragic