Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Iraq Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,463,192 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iraq within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Immigrants from Iraq. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to a decrease of 25.0 Immigrants from Iraq.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $41,365, a difference of 31.9%), median family income ($120,076 compared to $98,786, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,257 compared to $89,444, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $53,384, a difference of 0.79%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $59,824, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.0%), receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.49%), single female poverty (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.28%), currently married (46.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 73.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 68.8%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 63.7%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.53%), 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Iraq communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.1%).