Czech vs Ethiopian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Ethiopian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Ethiopians
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Ethiopian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,224,691 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,083,750 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 11.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czech | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 31.4% | 30.1% |
| Range | 29.9% | 28.6% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 12.6% |
| Median | 10.6% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Czechs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
| Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |