Immigrants from Austria vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,424,456 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from Austria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.621. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Austria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.004% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Austria corresponds to an increase of 1,003.5 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 16.6%), per capita income ($52,503 compared to $46,430, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,208 compared to $60,647, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,824 compared to $42,229, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,400 compared to $54,593, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($51,826 compared to $49,368, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and family poverty (7.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.10%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.74%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.7%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.38%), family households (63.1% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.5%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Austria and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%).