Ugandan vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Alaskan Athabascan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Alaskan Athabascans
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Alaskan Athabascan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,015,951 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,819,269 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 85.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 9.4% | 25.0% |
| Range | 9.0% | 22.1% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 9.0% |
| Median | 2.8% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Colville (5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Yup'ik (5.8%, a difference of 9.7%), Tlingit-Haida (4.8%, a difference of 9.9%), Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 13.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 5.8% |