Czechoslovakian vs Laotian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Laotian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Laotians
9.5%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
79.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Laotian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,521,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,417,666 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 12.1%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Laotian |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 44.2% | 29.9% |
Range | 43.1% | 27.9% |
Mean | 11.8% | 11.6% |
Median | 9.7% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 6.0% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Latvian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), British (9.4%, a difference of 0.43%), Scotch-Irish (9.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Belgian (9.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Native Hawaiian (9.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Menominee | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Finns | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Native Hawaiians | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.4% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 99.7 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Belgians | 99.7 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Laotians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Alaskan Athabascan (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Iraqi (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Greece (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Asia (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and American (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.7 /100 | #138 | Excellent 10.5% |
Portuguese | 84.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 83.4 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.5% |
Immigrants | Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 10.5% |
Osage | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Asia | 80.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.6% |
Iraqis | 80.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.6% |
Laotians | 79.9 /100 | #145 | Good 10.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 79.0 /100 | #147 | Good 10.6% |
Americans | 78.1 /100 | #148 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 78.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 77.3 /100 | #150 | Good 10.6% |
Spanish | 76.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 76.5 /100 | #152 | Good 10.6% |