Czech vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Czech
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Czechs
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
46.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
35.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czech vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,282,128 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,955,182 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 21.2%, a difference of 0.75%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czech | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
Minimum | 6.8% | 8.8% |
Maximum | 80.9% | 62.7% |
Range | 74.1% | 53.9% |
Mean | 29.6% | 20.6% |
Median | 25.3% | 19.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.2% | 23.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.7% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.3% | 8.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 8.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechs and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechs are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Yugoslavian (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |