Immigrants from England vs Bhutanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Bhutanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Bhutanese
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
83rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,675,853 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,052,143 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 9.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 72.8% | 66.7% |
| Range | 70.1% | 64.2% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 11.1% |
| Median | 11.6% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from North America (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |