Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Celtic
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Celtics
33.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
9.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
10.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
212th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Celtic Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,576,529 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.265 and weighted average of 33.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,463,744 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 33.3%, a difference of 0.19%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Celtic |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 14.0% |
| Maximum | 82.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 77.4% | 86.0% |
| Mean | 38.8% | 47.2% |
| Median | 34.4% | 39.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.8% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.6% | 55.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.8% | 24.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 24.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.7% | 24.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Celtics by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Slovak (33.4%, a difference of 0.050%), French (33.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.26%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.070%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Slovak (33.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Hawaiian (33.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
| Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
| German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
| Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
| Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
| Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
| Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
| French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
| Nepalese | 7.8 /100 | #216 | Tragic 33.5% |
| Spaniards | 7.0 /100 | #217 | Tragic 33.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 5.9 /100 | #218 | Tragic 33.7% |
| Alsatians | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Portuguese | 5.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Malaysians | 5.0 /100 | #221 | Tragic 33.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 33.9% |