Immigrants from France vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,040,471 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 46.5 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $46,430, a difference of 17.5%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and median family income ($120,076 compared to $105,964, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $54,593, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($44,541 compared to $42,229, a difference of 5.5%), and median earnings ($53,490 compared to $49,368, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and single female poverty (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.2%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.31%), no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.1%), professional degree (6.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 37.3%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.6%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.80%).