Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Greece Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,082,687 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Greece within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Immigrants from Greece. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 22.3 Immigrants from Greece.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 11.0%), median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $44,976, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,616 compared to $110,103, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,952 compared to $64,636, a difference of 0.49%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,402 compared to $113,548, a difference of 3.8%), and median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $62,689, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.9%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.2%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.9%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.70%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 68.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (63.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Greece communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 16.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.1%).