Crow Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Crow
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Crow Receiving Food Stamps
13.4%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
1.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,190,745 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142 and weighted average of 13.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Crow and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Crow influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Crow simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Crow by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Immigrants from El Salvador (13.5%, a difference of 0.22%), French American Indian (13.5%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Zaire (13.4%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Micronesia (13.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and Iroquois (13.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants from Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |
Comanche | 2.4 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants from Zaire | 1.9 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.4% |
Crow | 1.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants from El Salvador | 1.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.5% |
French American Indians | 1.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Micronesia | 1.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.5% |
Iroquois | 1.2 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.5% |
Choctaw | 1.0 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants from Panama | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.6% |
Somalis | 0.9 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.7% |
Crow Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
Minimum | 0.023% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 93.4% | 31.2% |
Range | 93.4% | 29.1% |
Mean | 30.6% | 15.8% |
Median | 11.9% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 20.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 68.5% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.3% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 34.7% | 6.6% |
Correlation Details
Crow Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.023% | 58,536,468 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 291,154 | 13.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 163,245 | 10.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 92,589 | 8.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 6,236 | 14.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 49,131 | 16.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 2,129 | 10.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 11,598 | 14.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.98% | 5,083 | 24.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 1,019 | 23.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,796 | 19.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.61% | 4,223 | 15.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 785 | 15.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.45% | 2,064 | 21.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 2,817 | 26.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.36% | 176 | 15.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.50% | 48 | 14.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.79% | 428 | 17.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.00% | 40 | 23.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.56% | 1,125 | 15.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35% | 783 | 20.2% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.74% | 3,803 | 14.9% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.12% | 5,199 | 13.8% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23% | 576 | 8.2% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.09% | 1,602 | 8.1% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.96% | 459 | 2.1% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.61% | 660 | 28.5% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.61% | 2,180 | 8.6% |
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.40% | 262 | 6.8% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.03% | 629 | 31.2% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.65% | 1,965 | 9.5% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.45% | 473 | 20.0% |