Czechoslovakian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Czechoslovakian Receiving Food Stamps
10.3%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,706,231 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.278 and weighted average of 10.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.39% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Egypt (10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Serbian (10.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Welsh (10.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Basque (10.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Greece (10.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Finns | 97.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Jordanians | 97.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Irish | 97.9 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Belgians | 97.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants from Greece | 97.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Basques | 97.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Welsh | 97.3 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 97.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 97.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Serbians | 97.0 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 96.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Palestinians | 96.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants from Europe | 96.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants from Latvia | 96.8 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Czechoslovakian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 35.5% | 66.5% |
| Range | 35.4% | 64.9% |
| Mean | 9.0% | 14.2% |
| Median | 6.6% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 11.8% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,309,166 | 11.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,160,431 | 8.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,404,884 | 8.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 1,993,962 | 8.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 679,142 | 9.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 466,195 | 12.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 243,265 | 9.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 131,299 | 9.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 43,319 | 10.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 34,818 | 11.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 52,683 | 8.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 32,778 | 15.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 20,573 | 8.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 27,803 | 6.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 21,168 | 7.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 11,683 | 13.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 14,207 | 11.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 9,633 | 14.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,370 | 13.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,644 | 14.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 6,719 | 11.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.37% | 1,359 | 1.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 3,448 | 11.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,588 | 15.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 164 | 4.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.44% | 3,372 | 19.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 6,075 | 4.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 1,722 | 14.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 109 | 17.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 52 | 46.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 3,657 | 8.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 340 | 5.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 2,075 | 19.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.35% | 278 | 56.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 1,544 | 8.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 1,000 | 4.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 952 | 18.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 1,452 | 12.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.94% | 67 | 13.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 14.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 12.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 588 | 26.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.59% | 1,775 | 20.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 59 | 6.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 102 | 19.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 151 | 13.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 2.1% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.28% | 116 | 8.5% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 504 | 66.5% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.89% | 87 | 16.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 18.2% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.46% | 141 | 6.6% |