Ute Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Ute Receiving Food Stamps
14.7%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,636,581 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.289 and weighted average of 14.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.15% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Western Africa (14.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Chippewa (14.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Guatemala (14.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and Mexican (14.6%, a difference of 0.44%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Immigrants from Central America | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Ute Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 96.2% | 59.3% |
| Range | 96.2% | 55.0% |
| Mean | 22.0% | 22.6% |
| Median | 7.3% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.1% | 28.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.0% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 29.1% | 14.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.5% | 14.5% |
Correlation Details
| Ute Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,226,474 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 249,144 | 11.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 55,786 | 16.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 28.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,899 | 17.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 1,918 | 10.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 59.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 26.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 8,830 | 17.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | 4.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 14,537 | 12.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.87% | 771 | 30.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 1,754 | 7.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 11.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 577 | 15.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 6.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 21.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71% | 140 | 50.0% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.40% | 283 | 31.1% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.36% | 191 | 56.1% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 16.1% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25% | 1,186 | 25.2% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 28.6% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 26.6% |