Bangladeshi Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Bangladeshi Receiving Food Stamps
15.0%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,258,280 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490 and weighted average of 15.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.48% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Bangladeshis and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Bangladeshis influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Bangladeshis simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Ecuador (15.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Central America (15.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.1%, a difference of 0.39%), African (15.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Mexico (15.2%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Seminole | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants from Central America | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants from Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.1% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants from Belize | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 15.2% |
Immigrants from Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 15.3% |
Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 15.4% |
Bangladeshi Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bangladeshi Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
Minimum | 0.061% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 53.2% | 63.8% |
Range | 53.1% | 60.0% |
Mean | 11.0% | 16.9% |
Median | 9.4% | 14.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.0% | 20.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.4% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 9.3% |
Correlation Details
Bangladeshi Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.061% | 114,803,391 | 12.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 8,735,547 | 11.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 3,549,241 | 12.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 1,835,801 | 12.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 1,956,530 | 9.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 2,129,322 | 13.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 1,191,285 | 18.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 713,911 | 11.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 624,931 | 9.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.13% | 471,590 | 10.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 936,270 | 12.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 328,098 | 16.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 538,614 | 14.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.42% | 290,997 | 14.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 30,701 | 11.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.98% | 761,348 | 18.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 167,116 | 22.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 107,730 | 11.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 174,810 | 24.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.44% | 63,086 | 21.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 170,696 | 23.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 50,484 | 20.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 10,557 | 14.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.66% | 37,988 | 29.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 42,735 | 15.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.18% | 52,886 | 29.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.55% | 12,684 | 16.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.03% | 148,369 | 20.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.40% | 51,109 | 14.6% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.63% | 136,085 | 18.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 134,205 | 16.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.33% | 64,531 | 24.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 70,827 | 22.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.85% | 31,292 | 11.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.27% | 308,806 | 15.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.69% | 1,215 | 3.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.89% | 32,912 | 12.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.59% | 2,208 | 7.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.76% | 84,951 | 12.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.26% | 2,006 | 10.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.48% | 13,459 | 5.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 95,310 | 18.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.91% | 932 | 20.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.04% | 13,116 | 31.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.39% | 132,092 | 14.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.74% | 216 | 6.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.48% | 6,790 | 19.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.66% | 34,220 | 10.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.23% | 7,581 | 34.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.31% | 17,716 | 8.5% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.74% | 619 | 7.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.23% | 26 | 16.7% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.55% | 1,218 | 10.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.55% | 57,662 | 21.8% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.16% | 19,613 | 34.6% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.74% | 734 | 14.7% |
[ 53.0% - 53.5% ] 53.15% | 111 | 63.8% |