Inupiat Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Inupiat
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Inupiat Receiving Food Stamps
20.1%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,290,078 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 20.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.23% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Inupiat and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Inupiat influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Inupiat simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Pueblo (19.9%, a difference of 0.73%), Yuman (20.2%, a difference of 0.86%), Immigrants from Caribbean (19.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Immigrants from Cuba (20.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and Navajo (21.1%, a difference of 5.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Immigrants from Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.0% |
| Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.1% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
Inupiat Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 5.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 76.7% |
| Range | 100.0% | 71.3% |
| Mean | 47.4% | 32.0% |
| Median | 50.0% | 27.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.5% | 50.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 81.4% | 36.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.1% | 20.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.7% | 20.4% |
Correlation Details
| Inupiat Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 94,655,359 | 13.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 414,029 | 9.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 320,115 | 14.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 96,146 | 11.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 453,266 | 10.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 170,010 | 13.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 32,479 | 13.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 66,389 | 7.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 10,052 | 20.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 3,070 | 10.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 7,328 | 17.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 983 | 19.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 2,062 | 64.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 2,858 | 6.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.77% | 888 | 17.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.85% | 452 | 29.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.60% | 4,229 | 5.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 119 | 9.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.20% | 329 | 17.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.23% | 616 | 60.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.75% | 16 | 54.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 1,640 | 74.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.51% | 78 | 20.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.47% | 843 | 76.7% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.74% | 69 | 18.2% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.26% | 95 | 15.8% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.16% | 692 | 72.5% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.06% | 51 | 27.3% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 60 | 54.5% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.38% | 9,755 | 11.0% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.38% | 752 | 19.8% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.68% | 4,453 | 14.9% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.36% | 4,150 | 14.2% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.61% | 3,255 | 15.7% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.59% | 3,088 | 15.7% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.11% | 1,128 | 32.7% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.68% | 1,242 | 11.4% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.28% | 444 | 47.8% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.68% | 630 | 50.8% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.67% | 554 | 59.3% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.88% | 344 | 27.9% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.30% | 558 | 34.8% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.79% | 1,114 | 65.0% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.30% | 1,308 | 45.0% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.95% | 378 | 31.1% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.10% | 1,686 | 39.5% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.91% | 846 | 37.4% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.23% | 266 | 47.2% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.57% | 809 | 21.0% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.31% | 1,652 | 59.4% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.72% | 1,136 | 51.3% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.96% | 1,288 | 54.9% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.08% | 1,072 | 49.0% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.60% | 588 | 36.0% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.19% | 2,138 | 55.5% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.29% | 586 | 50.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 535 | 42.9% |