Immigrants from Australia Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Immigrants from Australia Receiving Food Stamps
9.2%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Australia Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,603,605 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 9.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.53% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Australia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Immigrants from Australia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Luxembourger (9.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Latvian (9.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants from Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants from Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants from Australia Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Australia Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 0.57% |
| Maximum | 13.7% | 22.9% |
| Range | 13.7% | 22.3% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 9.4% |
| Median | 2.1% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.99% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 4.6% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Australia Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 147,998,217 | 11.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.099% | 50,211,155 | 10.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 12,086,891 | 6.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 6,322,147 | 7.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 2,795,123 | 6.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 2,515,264 | 5.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.44% | 1,255,807 | 7.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 1,074,466 | 6.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 786,478 | 5.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 357,243 | 5.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 204,525 | 9.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 277,065 | 8.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 97,751 | 9.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 104,198 | 6.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 77,200 | 6.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 12,326 | 15.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 88,187 | 4.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 87,163 | 5.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 38,149 | 2.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 35,729 | 9.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 15,023 | 8.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.50% | 34,819 | 11.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 2,209 | 11.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 7,542 | 9.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 3,756 | 4.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 5,624 | 13.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 28,971 | 4.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.90% | 9,016 | 14.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.99% | 2,668 | 10.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 3,511 | 14.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 4,777 | 14.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 2,191 | 22.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 8,781 | 2.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 5,478 | 12.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 40 | 12.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 3,842 | 9.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 14,578 | 10.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 5,447 | 0.57% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 812 | 3.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 10,274 | 0.90% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 215 | 13.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.54% | 396 | 8.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.61% | 416 | 11.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 774 | 9.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 301 | 10.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.33% | 300 | 12.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.43% | 158 | 8.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.50% | 867 | 21.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 1,537 | 11.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 271 | 5.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.52% | 326 | 16.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 130 | 11.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 614 | 9.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.88% | 800 | 6.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.23% | 83 | 2.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.80% | 1,307 | 14.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.73% | 565 | 9.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 102 | 19.6% |