Blackfeet Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Blackfeet Receiving Food Stamps
14.3%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 309,276,068 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 14.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.33% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Blackfeet and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Blackfeet influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Blackfeet simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Cheyenne (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Paiute (14.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Portugal (14.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Dutch West Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Creek | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Immigrants from Congo | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Paiute | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants from Uzbekistan | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Mexicans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Blackfeet Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Blackfeet Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
| Minimum | 0.088% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.9% | 97.8% |
| Mean | 25.5% | 25.7% |
| Median | 12.2% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.5% | 30.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.9% | 15.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.4% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 31.0% | 16.9% |
Correlation Details
| Blackfeet Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.088% | 300,616,487 | 13.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 6,513,319 | 14.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 986,639 | 16.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 679,538 | 17.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 210,553 | 17.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 75,652 | 16.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 45,017 | 21.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 28,443 | 15.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 32,733 | 14.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 5,465 | 13.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 7,458 | 24.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.82% | 14,933 | 17.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.26% | 9,647 | 21.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.64% | 5,107 | 15.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.26% | 4,213 | 16.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.67% | 3,965 | 19.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.41% | 2,034 | 29.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.80% | 2,148 | 12.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.07% | 375 | 5.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 913 | 41.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.32% | 853 | 49.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 2,538 | 16.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.24% | 147 | 28.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.78% | 266 | 50.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.20% | 197 | 2.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.83% | 94 | 30.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.37% | 167 | 11.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.58% | 240 | 12.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.28% | 1,253 | 30.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.67% | 534 | 31.2% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.94% | 3,061 | 19.9% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.98% | 5,008 | 18.1% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.73% | 354 | 17.1% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.88% | 414 | 16.8% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.06% | 262 | 14.7% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.78% | 1,317 | 46.0% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.48% | 69 | 30.8% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.35% | 1,654 | 44.6% |
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.09% | 7,532 | 26.6% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.65% | 871 | 23.8% |
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.34% | 3,001 | 20.2% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.96% | 229 | 52.5% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.43% | 690 | 42.7% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.78% | 554 | 52.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 124 | 100.0% |