Arab Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Arab
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Arab Receiving Food Stamps
11.5%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
64.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Arab Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,746,764 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Arabs and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.444 and weighted average of 11.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.29% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Arabs and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Arabs influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Arabs simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Arabs by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Arabs are Immigrants from Chile (11.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Belarus (11.5%, a difference of 0.30%), Alsatian (11.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and Pennsylvania German (11.4%, a difference of 0.60%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 72.6 /100 | #158 | Good 11.3% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 70.4 /100 | #159 | Good 11.4% |
| French Canadians | 69.5 /100 | #160 | Good 11.4% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.4 /100 | #161 | Good 11.4% |
| Alsatians | 68.0 /100 | #162 | Good 11.4% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 65.8 /100 | #163 | Good 11.5% |
| Immigrants from Chile | 65.0 /100 | #164 | Good 11.5% |
| Arabs | 64.7 /100 | #165 | Good 11.5% |
| Immigrants from Belarus | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 11.5% |
| Kenyans | 60.2 /100 | #167 | Good 11.6% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 59.1 /100 | #168 | Average 11.6% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Africa | 58.3 /100 | #169 | Average 11.6% |
| Costa Ricans | 57.9 /100 | #170 | Average 11.6% |
| Immigrants from Western Asia | 56.4 /100 | #171 | Average 11.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 54.2 /100 | #172 | Average 11.7% |
Arab Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Arab Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
| Minimum | 0.20% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 64.1% | 41.3% |
| Range | 63.9% | 39.2% |
| Mean | 14.9% | 14.1% |
| Median | 11.6% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.2% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 8.5% |
Correlation Details
| Arab Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 196,794,069 | 13.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 127,672,821 | 11.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 73,608,045 | 10.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 39,378,723 | 11.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 15,841,164 | 10.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 11,106,144 | 7.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 6,835,487 | 9.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 3,295,413 | 7.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 2,069,543 | 9.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 2,126,084 | 12.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 931,362 | 7.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 832,927 | 8.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 680,873 | 9.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 438,413 | 8.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.93% | 214,902 | 14.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.31% | 413,066 | 7.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 280,829 | 6.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.24% | 139,740 | 15.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 281,970 | 19.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.98% | 198,684 | 10.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 81,508 | 9.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.86% | 322,832 | 13.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.37% | 30,165 | 33.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.63% | 86,980 | 8.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.18% | 51,130 | 6.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.42% | 98,207 | 12.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 127,872 | 16.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.30% | 144,458 | 20.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 47,159 | 19.6% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.15% | 48,494 | 12.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.43% | 22,082 | 18.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 122 | 20.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.53% | 36,927 | 4.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.60% | 72,809 | 20.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.24% | 1,215 | 12.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 156 | 20.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.95% | 1,467 | 5.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 34,046 | 9.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.52% | 1,132 | 10.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.22% | 25,337 | 26.4% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.50% | 120 | 2.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.40% | 886 | 6.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.02% | 8,551 | 13.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.62% | 160 | 2.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.57% | 51 | 10.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.88% | 96 | 3.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.30% | 43,213 | 41.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.80% | 314 | 10.5% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.52% | 27,842 | 37.4% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 32.00% | 12,405 | 9.2% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.47% | 62,474 | 19.1% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.38% | 5,526 | 30.6% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.01% | 108,414 | 20.0% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.98% | 40,392 | 19.5% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.71% | 8,919 | 16.6% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.10% | 53,044 | 33.2% |