Inupiat In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Inupiat
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Inupiat In Labor Force | Age 20-64
76.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,348,375 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182 and weighted average of 76.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.057% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Inupiat and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Inupiat influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Inupiat simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Chickasaw (76.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Cherokee (76.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Yakama (75.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Yaqui (76.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Seminole (75.5%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 76.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 76.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 76.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 76.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 76.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 76.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 76.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 76.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 75.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 75.5% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 75.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 75.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 75.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 75.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 75.1% |
Inupiat In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 33.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 93.9% |
| Range | 100.0% | 60.6% |
| Mean | 45.3% | 70.2% |
| Median | 36.6% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 62.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.5% | 79.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 78.9% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.2% | 11.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.9% | 11.8% |
Correlation Details
| Inupiat Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 94,681,003 | 79.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 432,401 | 77.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 320,421 | 74.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 100,478 | 75.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 456,675 | 79.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 170,010 | 75.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 32,728 | 78.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 70,281 | 79.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 10,052 | 80.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.69% | 3,070 | 57.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 7,328 | 73.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 983 | 79.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 2,372 | 72.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.51% | 2,858 | 64.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.46% | 134 | 73.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.77% | 927 | 70.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.05% | 584 | 61.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.82% | 499 | 84.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.60% | 4,229 | 76.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.25% | 478 | 71.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 119 | 60.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 9 | 62.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.20% | 329 | 85.1% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.23% | 616 | 68.6% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 1,640 | 80.6% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.51% | 78 | 57.9% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.38% | 1,113 | 70.1% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.74% | 69 | 93.9% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.26% | 95 | 35.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.16% | 692 | 56.7% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.06% | 51 | 33.3% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 60 | 50.0% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.38% | 9,755 | 80.5% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.38% | 752 | 86.6% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.68% | 4,453 | 82.7% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.36% | 4,150 | 81.9% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.61% | 3,255 | 81.5% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.59% | 3,088 | 79.9% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.11% | 1,128 | 83.7% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.68% | 1,242 | 79.6% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.28% | 444 | 62.2% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.68% | 630 | 66.7% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.67% | 554 | 58.7% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.88% | 344 | 70.0% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.30% | 558 | 68.2% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.79% | 1,114 | 50.0% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.30% | 1,308 | 52.3% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.95% | 378 | 75.9% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.10% | 1,686 | 65.7% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.91% | 846 | 69.3% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.23% | 266 | 58.9% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.57% | 809 | 81.2% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.31% | 1,652 | 63.9% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.72% | 1,136 | 60.5% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.96% | 1,288 | 62.7% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.08% | 1,072 | 66.6% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.60% | 588 | 73.7% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.19% | 2,138 | 60.8% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.30% | 824 | 74.5% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 535 | 74.8% |