Inupiat Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Inupiat
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Inupiat Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
18.1%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,013,278 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 18.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Inupiat and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Inupiat influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Inupiat simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Africa (18.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Nepalese (18.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Nonimmigrants (18.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and Cuban (17.9%, a difference of 0.89%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Iraqis | 5.5 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Immigrants from Panama | 4.3 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 3.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Cubans | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Nepalese | 3.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Inupiat | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 2.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Nonimmigrants | 2.2 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Immigrants from Micronesia | 1.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Fijians | 1.8 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 1.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Marshallese | 1.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.4% |
Inupiat Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 69.2% |
| Range | 100.0% | 66.1% |
| Mean | 53.7% | 25.2% |
| Median | 68.1% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.1% | 36.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 85.0% | 24.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 39.3% | 17.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 38.9% | 17.6% |
Correlation Details
| Inupiat Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 94,448,180 | 19.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 406,655 | 15.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 312,888 | 17.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 91,113 | 11.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 439,382 | 12.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 162,265 | 18.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 17,931 | 13.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.75% | 63,046 | 6.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 9,684 | 19.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.63% | 2,159 | 11.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.06% | 7,328 | 15.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.11% | 2,062 | 45.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 587 | 31.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.85% | 452 | 26.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.23% | 616 | 19.7% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 1,640 | 60.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.47% | 843 | 69.2% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.16% | 692 | 69.2% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.38% | 9,755 | 5.0% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.38% | 752 | 9.7% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.68% | 4,453 | 7.2% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.36% | 4,150 | 7.0% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.61% | 3,255 | 15.1% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.59% | 3,088 | 15.1% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.11% | 1,128 | 11.7% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.68% | 1,242 | 3.1% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.28% | 444 | 52.1% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.68% | 630 | 21.4% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.67% | 554 | 38.5% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.88% | 344 | 32.0% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.30% | 558 | 13.3% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.79% | 1,114 | 46.1% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.30% | 1,308 | 25.2% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.95% | 378 | 5.4% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.10% | 1,686 | 22.5% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.91% | 846 | 50.8% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.23% | 266 | 59.3% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.57% | 809 | 9.1% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.31% | 1,652 | 37.3% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.72% | 1,136 | 34.9% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.96% | 1,288 | 11.5% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.08% | 1,072 | 5.9% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.60% | 588 | 28.1% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.19% | 2,138 | 38.0% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.29% | 586 | 36.4% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 535 | 31.7% |