Blackfeet Single Father Households
COMPARE
Blackfeet
Select to Compare
Single Father Households
Blackfeet Single Father Households
2.7%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Blackfeet Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,723,942 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 2.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in percentage of single father households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Blackfeet and percentage of single father households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Blackfeet influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of single father households within an area, or if Blackfeet simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of single father households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Blackfeet by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Blackfeet are Choctaw (2.7%, a difference of 0.46%), Puget Sound Salish (2.7%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Fiji (2.7%, a difference of 0.62%), Tlingit-Haida (2.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and Malaysian (2.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
Hawaiians | 0.1 /100 | #284 | Tragic 2.7% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #285 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #286 | Tragic 2.7% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants from Cambodia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 2.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 2.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 2.7% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 2.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 2.7% |
Immigrants from Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 2.7% |
Malaysians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 2.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 2.8% |
Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 2.8% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 2.8% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 2.8% |
Blackfeet Single Father Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Blackfeet Data | Single Father Households Data |
Minimum | 0.087% | 0.71% |
Maximum | 92.8% | 19.4% |
Range | 92.7% | 18.7% |
Mean | 25.6% | 5.6% |
Median | 10.0% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.4% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.0% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 30.6% | 4.6% |
Correlation Details
Blackfeet Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.087% | 299,510,191 | 2.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 6,262,016 | 2.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 908,637 | 3.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 632,756 | 3.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 190,223 | 3.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 67,697 | 3.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 35,922 | 2.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 26,307 | 5.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.26% | 24,625 | 3.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.68% | 5,358 | 3.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 2,167 | 9.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83% | 10,900 | 4.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.26% | 9,388 | 3.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 1,244 | 1.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.13% | 841 | 7.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 3,002 | 1.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.41% | 2,353 | 9.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.85% | 576 | 0.71% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.01% | 322 | 1.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 610 | 3.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.32% | 853 | 9.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.26% | 1,563 | 1.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.72% | 173 | 2.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.58% | 240 | 2.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.27% | 166 | 14.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.94% | 3,061 | 4.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.98% | 5,008 | 3.5% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.53% | 85 | 15.0% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.88% | 414 | 2.2% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.06% | 262 | 2.9% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.78% | 1,317 | 3.3% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.90% | 863 | 14.7% |
[ 47.0% - 47.5% ] 47.23% | 271 | 19.4% |
[ 82.0% - 82.5% ] 82.35% | 1,654 | 3.9% |
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.09% | 7,532 | 5.0% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.65% | 871 | 3.2% |
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.34% | 3,001 | 8.9% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.96% | 229 | 16.9% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.43% | 690 | 6.4% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.78% | 554 | 8.0% |