Ute No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
No Vehicles in Household
Ute No Vehicles in Household
11.6%
NO VEHICLES AVAILABLE
3.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,604,944 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.109 and weighted average of 11.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in percentage of households with no vehicle available.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and percentage of households with no vehicle available does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of households with no vehicle available within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of households with no vehicle available due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Russian (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Cree (11.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Taiwanese (11.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants (11.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and Eastern European (11.7%, a difference of 0.58%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants from Norway | 5.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 5.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 11.4% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 4.8 /100 | #232 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Houma | 4.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 4.5 /100 | #234 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Russians | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Taiwanese | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | 2.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 2.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Turks | 2.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Cheyenne | 2.4 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants from Portugal | 2.2 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.7% |
Ute No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute Data | No Vehicles in Household Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 54.2% |
| Range | 100.0% | 52.9% |
| Mean | 22.7% | 10.0% |
| Median | 7.3% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.5% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 31.8% | 10.7% |
Correlation Details
| Ute Percentile | Sample Size | No Vehicles in Household |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,201,568 | 15.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 243,567 | 5.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 50,335 | 4.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 10.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,327 | 4.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 7,421 | 1.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 54.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 10.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.85% | 8,346 | 8.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | 6.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,538 | 5.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.81% | 470 | 7.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 1,754 | 4.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 3.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 485 | 14.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.16% | 484 | 14.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 1.9% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 1.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 6.7% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 8.6% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25% | 1,186 | 5.5% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 3.9% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 17.2% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 62 | 23.5% |