Ute In Labor Force | Age 45-54
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Ute In Labor Force | Age 45-54
76.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 45-54
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,657,904 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.511 and weighted average of 76.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.33% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 45 and 54 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by In Labor Force | Age 45-54
In terms of in labor force | age 45-54, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Paiute (76.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Yuman (76.3%, a difference of 0.41%), Arapaho (77.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Native/Alaskan (77.1%, a difference of 0.67%), and Apache (77.1%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 77.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 77.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 77.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 77.1% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 77.1% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 77.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 76.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 76.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 76.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 75.9% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 75.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 75.5% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 75.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 75.0% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.4% |
Ute In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute Data | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 Data |
Minimum | 0.028% | 38.0% |
Maximum | 96.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 96.2% | 62.0% |
Mean | 18.5% | 75.4% |
Median | 7.8% | 77.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 58.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 88.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 29.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.6% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.1% | 16.9% |
Correlation Details
Ute Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 45-54 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,238,532 | 81.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 249,344 | 74.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 56,635 | 80.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 60.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,998 | 83.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 8,458 | 83.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 387 | 54.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 88.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 8,830 | 76.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | 58.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,894 | 77.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 498 | 77.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.87% | 771 | 82.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 1,754 | 88.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 73.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.13% | 158 | 100.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.75% | 577 | 72.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.16% | 484 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 84.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.93% | 244 | 100.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 45.9% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71% | 140 | 88.2% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 100.0% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 51.3% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.25% | 1,186 | 57.4% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.06% | 1,691 | 38.0% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.19% | 472 | 56.6% |