Ute In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Ute
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Ute In Labor Force | Age 25-29
80.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,662,248 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.274 and weighted average of 80.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.35% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ute influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 within an area, or if Ute simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ute by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Creek (80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Ute In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute Data | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 16.2% |
| Maximum | 67.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 67.8% | 83.8% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 79.2% |
| Median | 6.5% | 81.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 73.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 26.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 21.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 20.5% |
Correlation Details
| Ute Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 55,248,495 | 84.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 249,344 | 78.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 56,400 | 73.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.67% | 10,159 | 53.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 50,998 | 71.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.75% | 8,458 | 94.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 2,004 | 82.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.86% | 8,830 | 81.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 1,151 | 75.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.71% | 14,538 | 75.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22% | 498 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.81% | 470 | 47.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 1,754 | 88.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.33% | 1,285 | 56.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.87% | 92 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 5,495 | 86.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.93% | 244 | 100.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.07% | 616 | 75.8% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.71% | 140 | 100.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.77% | 310 | 100.0% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.12% | 136 | 100.0% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.87% | 831 | 16.2% |