Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
10.9%
POVERTY | SENIORS > 75
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
39th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,126,572 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 10.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.11% in poverty level among seniors over the age of 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Thai (10.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Finnish (10.8%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Lithuania (11.0%, a difference of 0.71%), Latvian (10.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and Scotch-Irish (10.8%, a difference of 0.93%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| British | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Latvians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Finns | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.4 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Thais | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Austrians | 99.1 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Celtics | 99.1 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Belgians | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Greeks | 99.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Czechoslovakian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 0.75% |
| Maximum | 35.5% | 57.4% |
| Range | 35.4% | 56.6% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 15.0% |
| Median | 4.8% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 11.0% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 327,200,333 | 11.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 27,335,718 | 9.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,158,544 | 9.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 1,809,715 | 11.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 646,702 | 9.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 413,677 | 10.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 192,943 | 9.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 116,927 | 13.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 33,781 | 12.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.35% | 26,869 | 16.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 49,395 | 15.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 25,744 | 10.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 14,962 | 14.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 22,638 | 8.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 15,955 | 15.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.95% | 8,757 | 19.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 12,564 | 15.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.41% | 3,896 | 20.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,284 | 15.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 3,065 | 1.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.17% | 6,325 | 18.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.29% | 2,343 | 19.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 2,538 | 0.75% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,761 | 16.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 310 | 33.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.44% | 2,501 | 23.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 5,713 | 16.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 723 | 57.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 340 | 15.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 1,886 | 15.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.50% | 1,810 | 7.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 688 | 17.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.39% | 395 | 3.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 2,108 | 3.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 8.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.64% | 110 | 16.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 666 | 49.3% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 8.3% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.46% | 141 | 1.4% |