Crow Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Crow
Select to Compare
Single Female Poverty
Crow Single Female Poverty
32.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE FEMALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,998,568 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 32.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in poverty level among single females.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Crow and poverty level among single females does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Crow influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single females within an area, or if Crow simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single females due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Crow by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Lumbee (33.0%, a difference of 1.8%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.7%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |
Crow Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow Data | Single Female Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.023% | 15.4% |
| Maximum | 91.7% | 61.5% |
| Range | 91.6% | 46.1% |
| Mean | 29.4% | 39.3% |
| Median | 9.4% | 40.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 28.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 72.7% | 48.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 69.6% | 19.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.0% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 34.4% | 11.8% |
Correlation Details
| Crow Percentile | Sample Size | Single Female Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.023% | 58,390,110 | 23.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 264,786 | 29.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 149,714 | 27.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 90,686 | 37.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 5,719 | 61.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 46,315 | 27.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 1,957 | 28.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 10,830 | 51.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 1,358 | 52.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.98% | 5,083 | 59.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 1,019 | 15.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,796 | 41.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.62% | 3,914 | 50.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 7.00% | 729 | 28.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.45% | 2,064 | 48.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.08% | 2,817 | 47.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.79% | 428 | 47.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.56% | 1,125 | 21.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35% | 783 | 21.2% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.74% | 3,803 | 49.1% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.12% | 5,199 | 40.9% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.23% | 576 | 36.1% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.09% | 1,602 | 47.2% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.96% | 459 | 47.6% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.61% | 660 | 33.3% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.61% | 2,180 | 40.9% |
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.40% | 262 | 46.8% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.03% | 629 | 33.3% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.65% | 1,965 | 43.8% |