Crow Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Crow
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Crow Births to Unmarried Women
40.4%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,263,233 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.126 and weighted average of 40.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.11% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Crow and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Crow influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Crow simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Crow by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yakama (40.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bahamas (40.1%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (40.1%, a difference of 0.68%), Bahamian (40.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and Apache (39.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 39.7% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 39.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 39.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 39.9% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.1% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 40.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 41.0% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
Crow Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 26.1% |
Maximum | 91.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 91.6% | 73.9% |
Mean | 24.2% | 62.6% |
Median | 5.4% | 50.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 42.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.3% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 57.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 34.8% | 29.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 34.0% | 28.4% |
Correlation Details
Crow Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 57,757,775 | 32.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 214,190 | 30.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.27% | 144,488 | 31.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 71,170 | 42.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 716 | 42.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 46,232 | 49.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 1,520 | 26.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 6,176 | 43.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 1,358 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 1,799 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 1,019 | 64.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 1,440 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.62% | 3,914 | 50.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.45% | 2,064 | 57.4% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.79% | 428 | 85.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.56% | 1,125 | 100.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.35% | 783 | 100.0% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.09% | 1,602 | 29.2% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.61% | 660 | 100.0% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.61% | 2,180 | 45.0% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.03% | 629 | 100.0% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.65% | 1,965 | 45.0% |