Bangladeshi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Bangladeshi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
20.0%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,467,619 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 20.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.60% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Bangladeshis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Bangladeshis influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Bangladeshis simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants from Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
Bangladeshi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.061% | 0.72% |
| Maximum | 40.7% | 54.5% |
| Range | 40.7% | 53.8% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 22.6% |
| Median | 8.6% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 14.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 29.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 11.1% |
Correlation Details
| Bangladeshi Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.061% | 114,434,232 | 17.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 8,580,778 | 16.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 3,472,353 | 16.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 1,808,109 | 16.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 1,919,530 | 15.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 2,111,188 | 17.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 1,188,095 | 23.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 680,759 | 17.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 613,584 | 12.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.13% | 467,932 | 14.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.47% | 935,988 | 16.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 321,360 | 20.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 538,614 | 15.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.42% | 290,997 | 20.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 30,701 | 18.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.98% | 761,348 | 25.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.48% | 156,310 | 31.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 107,730 | 12.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 174,810 | 33.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 56,204 | 28.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 148,658 | 33.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 50,484 | 27.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 10,557 | 36.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.68% | 31,835 | 36.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 41,933 | 11.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.18% | 52,886 | 38.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.55% | 12,684 | 20.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.03% | 148,369 | 21.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.40% | 51,109 | 11.9% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.63% | 136,085 | 22.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 134,205 | 13.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.33% | 64,531 | 30.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 70,827 | 25.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.85% | 31,292 | 12.7% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.27% | 308,806 | 25.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.89% | 32,912 | 7.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.59% | 2,208 | 32.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.76% | 84,951 | 6.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.26% | 2,006 | 16.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.48% | 13,459 | 0.72% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 95,310 | 24.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.91% | 932 | 35.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.04% | 13,116 | 11.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.39% | 132,092 | 25.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.74% | 216 | 52.4% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.48% | 6,790 | 24.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.66% | 34,220 | 14.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.23% | 7,581 | 25.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.31% | 17,716 | 3.2% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.55% | 1,218 | 26.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.55% | 57,662 | 30.1% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.16% | 19,613 | 46.4% |
[ 40.5% - 41.0% ] 40.74% | 734 | 54.5% |