Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Netherlands Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,471,508 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Netherlands. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 27.5 Immigrants from Netherlands.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $50,458, a difference of 12.0%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $105,082, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $41,870, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $52,592, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($48,673 compared to $50,818, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.7%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.0%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.62%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.3%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.9%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.69%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.4%).