Lithuanian vs Jordanian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Jordanian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Lithuanians
Jordanians
19.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Jordanian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 412,150,693 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 2.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lithuanian | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 6.1% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 57.6% | 34.8% |
| Range | 51.5% | 33.7% |
| Mean | 22.8% | 17.3% |
| Median | 19.4% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.7% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.4% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians and Jordanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Cambodian (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Russian (19.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Sri Lankan (19.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (19.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and Eastern European (19.1%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Indonesia (18.9%, a difference of 0.53%), Macedonian (18.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Cambodians | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 19.2% |