Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Ohio

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Material Moving
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Ohio
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Ohio

0.0%
60.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Ohio Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Ohio

City % Employed vs State vs National
1.Rosewood58.2%4.9%(+53.3)#13.8%(+54.4)#72
2.Old Fort53.1%4.9%(+48.1)#23.8%(+49.2)#90
3.Mitiwanga50.6%4.9%(+45.6)#33.8%(+46.7)#97
4.Pancoastburg50.0%4.9%(+45.1)#43.8%(+46.2)#102
5.Mount Hope48.1%4.9%(+43.1)#53.8%(+44.2)#111
6.Raymond47.8%4.9%(+42.8)#63.8%(+43.9)#112
7.Darbyville37.6%4.9%(+32.7)#73.8%(+33.8)#187
8.Pulaski34.9%4.9%(+29.9)#83.8%(+31.1)#219
9.Sinking Spring31.6%4.9%(+26.7)#93.8%(+27.8)#272
10.Vienna Center31.4%4.9%(+26.4)#103.8%(+27.5)#281
11.Tedrow30.0%4.9%(+25.1)#113.8%(+26.2)#308
12.Bairdstown29.8%4.9%(+24.9)#123.8%(+26.0)#310
13.Highland Holiday28.2%4.9%(+23.2)#133.8%(+24.3)#351
14.Burgoon27.7%4.9%(+22.7)#143.8%(+23.8)#365
15.Westminster27.4%4.9%(+22.5)#153.8%(+23.6)#371
16.Tippecanoe26.7%4.9%(+21.7)#163.8%(+22.8)#387
17.Chatfield26.2%4.9%(+21.3)#173.8%(+22.4)#400
18.Moscow26.0%4.9%(+21.1)#183.8%(+22.2)#404
19.Linndale25.4%4.9%(+20.4)#193.8%(+21.5)#429
20.Rose Farm25.0%4.9%(+20.1)#203.8%(+21.2)#442
21.New Alexandria23.7%4.9%(+18.7)#213.8%(+19.9)#503
22.West Leipsic23.5%4.9%(+18.5)#223.8%(+19.7)#510
23.Adamsville23.3%4.9%(+18.4)#233.8%(+19.5)#519
24.Urbancrest23.2%4.9%(+18.2)#243.8%(+19.4)#528
25.Holiday City23.1%4.9%(+18.1)#253.8%(+19.2)#535
26.Wilkesville22.8%4.9%(+17.9)#263.8%(+19.0)#551
27.East Rochester22.8%4.9%(+17.9)#273.8%(+19.0)#552
28.Damascus22.5%4.9%(+17.6)#283.8%(+18.7)#566
29.Cygnet21.4%4.9%(+16.5)#293.8%(+17.6)#625
30.Florida21.4%4.9%(+16.4)#303.8%(+17.5)#634
31.Lewisville21.3%4.9%(+16.4)#313.8%(+17.5)#636
32.Quaker City21.2%4.9%(+16.3)#323.8%(+17.4)#640
33.Duncan Falls21.2%4.9%(+16.2)#333.8%(+17.3)#643
34.East Alliance20.8%4.9%(+15.9)#343.8%(+17.0)#667
35.Hollansburg20.8%4.9%(+15.8)#353.8%(+16.9)#671
36.West Manchester20.7%4.9%(+15.8)#363.8%(+16.9)#675
37.Montezuma20.5%4.9%(+15.5)#373.8%(+16.6)#699
38.Stony Ridge20.2%4.9%(+15.3)#383.8%(+16.4)#710
39.Marlboro20.2%4.9%(+15.2)#393.8%(+16.3)#714
40.Byesville19.7%4.9%(+14.8)#403.8%(+15.9)#744
41.Neapolis19.7%4.9%(+14.7)#413.8%(+15.8)#751
42.Vinton19.4%4.9%(+14.4)#423.8%(+15.5)#769
43.Arcadia18.8%4.9%(+13.9)#433.8%(+15.0)#814
44.Milton Center18.8%4.9%(+13.8)#443.8%(+14.9)#822
45.New Bavaria18.8%4.9%(+13.8)#453.8%(+14.9)#824
46.St Johns18.7%4.9%(+13.7)#463.8%(+14.8)#832
47.Midland18.6%4.9%(+13.7)#473.8%(+14.8)#833
48.Belmore18.4%4.9%(+13.5)#483.8%(+14.6)#863
49.Kalida18.3%4.9%(+13.3)#493.8%(+14.4)#876
50.Miller18.2%4.9%(+13.2)#503.8%(+14.4)#882
51.Shiloh18.0%4.9%(+13.0)#513.8%(+14.1)#913
52.Hooven17.8%4.9%(+12.8)#523.8%(+13.9)#931
53.New Marshfield17.6%4.9%(+12.7)#533.8%(+13.8)#943
54.Coldwater17.6%4.9%(+12.6)#543.8%(+13.7)#962
55.Mccutchenville17.1%4.9%(+12.1)#553.8%(+13.2)#1,032
56.Rossburg16.9%4.9%(+12.0)#563.8%(+13.1)#1,048
57.Alger16.6%4.9%(+11.7)#573.8%(+12.8)#1,104
58.Sparta16.4%4.9%(+11.5)#583.8%(+12.6)#1,120
59.Blacklick Estates16.4%4.9%(+11.4)#593.8%(+12.5)#1,131
60.New Bloomington16.1%4.9%(+11.2)#603.8%(+12.3)#1,172
61.Benton Ridge16.1%4.9%(+11.1)#613.8%(+12.2)#1,181
62.Elizabethtown15.9%4.9%(+11.0)#623.8%(+12.1)#1,201
63.Jersey15.8%4.9%(+10.8)#633.8%(+12.0)#1,224
64.Lawrenceville15.7%4.9%(+10.8)#643.8%(+11.9)#1,239
65.Norwich15.6%4.9%(+10.6)#653.8%(+11.7)#1,269
66.New Straitsville15.4%4.9%(+10.5)#663.8%(+11.6)#1,293
67.Suffield15.4%4.9%(+10.4)#673.8%(+11.6)#1,299
68.Newport Cdp Shelby County15.4%4.9%(+10.4)#683.8%(+11.6)#1,305
69.New Weston15.4%4.9%(+10.4)#693.8%(+11.6)#1,306
70.Mutual15.4%4.9%(+10.4)#703.8%(+11.6)#1,309
71.Stony Prairie15.2%4.9%(+10.3)#713.8%(+11.4)#1,331
72.Guilford Lake15.2%4.9%(+10.2)#723.8%(+11.3)#1,341
73.Williamsburg15.2%4.9%(+10.2)#733.8%(+11.3)#1,342
74.Mount Blanchard15.0%4.9%(+10.1)#743.8%(+11.2)#1,377
75.Rockford14.9%4.9%(+9.93)#753.8%(+11.0)#1,403
76.Williamsdale14.7%4.9%(+9.76)#763.8%(+10.9)#1,437
77.Custar14.5%4.9%(+9.57)#773.8%(+10.7)#1,481
78.Spencer14.5%4.9%(+9.50)#783.8%(+10.6)#1,497
79.Frazeysburg14.4%4.9%(+9.44)#793.8%(+10.6)#1,507
80.North Industry14.3%4.9%(+9.34)#803.8%(+10.5)#1,523
81.Rome Stout14.3%4.9%(+9.34)#813.8%(+10.5)#1,549
82.Millville14.2%4.9%(+9.29)#823.8%(+10.4)#1,559
83.Maple Ridge14.1%4.9%(+9.18)#833.8%(+10.3)#1,574
84.Good Hope14.1%4.9%(+9.17)#843.8%(+10.3)#1,579
85.Oak Hill14.1%4.9%(+9.12)#853.8%(+10.2)#1,591
86.Greenwich14.0%4.9%(+9.09)#863.8%(+10.2)#1,605
87.Glenmoor14.0%4.9%(+9.03)#873.8%(+10.1)#1,617
88.Edison14.0%4.9%(+9.03)#883.8%(+10.1)#1,623
89.Geneva On The Lake13.9%4.9%(+9.00)#893.8%(+10.1)#1,626
90.Rushsylvania13.9%4.9%(+9.00)#903.8%(+10.1)#1,627
91.Killbuck13.9%4.9%(+8.95)#913.8%(+10.1)#1,641
92.Windham13.7%4.9%(+8.78)#923.8%(+9.90)#1,691
93.Belle Center13.6%4.9%(+8.68)#933.8%(+9.79)#1,728
94.Coal Grove13.5%4.9%(+8.59)#943.8%(+9.70)#1,758
95.Piqua13.5%4.9%(+8.55)#953.8%(+9.67)#1,767
96.Stratton13.4%4.9%(+8.43)#963.8%(+9.55)#1,792
97.West Jefferson13.4%4.9%(+8.41)#973.8%(+9.53)#1,797
98.Castine13.3%4.9%(+8.38)#983.8%(+9.50)#1,815
99.Friendship13.3%4.9%(+8.36)#993.8%(+9.48)#1,822
100.Dennison13.2%4.9%(+8.28)#1003.8%(+9.39)#1,842

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Ohio?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Ohio are:
#1
58.2%
#2
53.1%
#3
50.6%
#4
50.0%
#5
47.8%
#6
37.6%
#7
34.9%
#8
31.6%
#9
31.4%
#10
30.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Ohio?
Rosewood has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Ohio with 58.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the State of Ohio?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in Ohio is 4.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Material Moving in the United States is 3.8%.