Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from Japan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Immigrants from Japan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Immigrants from Japan
12.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from Japan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,078,093 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.195 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,963,649 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.855 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Immigrants from Japan |
Minimum | 4.5% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 100.0% |
Range | 18.5% | 97.1% |
Mean | 9.3% | 21.6% |
Median | 8.4% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 8.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 24.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 24.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Japan by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Immigrants from Asia (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Ukrainian (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), German (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and Indian (Asian) (12.2%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Immigrants from Romania (12.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Turkish (11.9%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Asia | 98.1 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Germans | 98.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 12.2% |