Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
14.7%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,606,017 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.15% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Tlingit-Haida influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Tlingit-Haida simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 98.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants from Austria | 98.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Taiwanese | 98.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 98.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 14.6% |
| Immigrants from Russia | 97.9 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 97.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Tlingit-Haida Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.036% | 0.43% |
| Maximum | 76.8% | 50.0% |
| Range | 76.8% | 49.6% |
| Mean | 18.5% | 16.8% |
| Median | 10.4% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 25.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.4% | 18.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.7% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 11.8% |
Correlation Details
| Tlingit-Haida Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.036% | 58,844,090 | 17.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 1,272,657 | 14.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 242,566 | 11.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 73,933 | 26.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 25,685 | 17.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 7,382 | 2.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 3,411 | 30.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.87% | 698 | 17.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 1,216 | 32.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 822 | 24.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.24% | 420 | 8.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 1,762 | 0.44% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.91% | 564 | 7.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.94% | 2,146 | 0.43% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 146 | 33.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 9.00% | 6,691 | 6.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.13% | 2,902 | 2.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70% | 29,933 | 3.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.00% | 32,108 | 5.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.18% | 13,913 | 7.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.26% | 18,041 | 16.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.67% | 8,168 | 11.3% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.26% | 2,169 | 25.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.92% | 1,727 | 19.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.23% | 4,267 | 24.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.55% | 1,073 | 13.9% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.96% | 1,128 | 4.8% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.59% | 82 | 50.0% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.78% | 920 | 30.3% |
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.33% | 1,792 | 7.0% |
[ 51.0% - 51.5% ] 51.24% | 804 | 35.7% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.59% | 361 | 14.3% |
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.41% | 1,602 | 31.0% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.85% | 838 | 18.0% |