Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
16.2%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
64.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,961,993 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.422 and weighted average of 16.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.6% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yugoslavians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yugoslavians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Yugoslavians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Costa Rican (16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Venezuela (16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and Afghan (16.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
| French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
| South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
| Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 64.0 /100 | #171 | Good 16.2% |
| Afghans | 62.3 /100 | #172 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants from South America | 55.1 /100 | #173 | Average 16.4% |
| Ethiopians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 16.5% |
| Lebanese | 45.4 /100 | #175 | Average 16.6% |
Yugoslavian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.059% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 26.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.3% | 99.2% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 20.4% |
| Median | 4.1% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.0% | 21.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 18.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 17.9% |
Correlation Details
| Yugoslavian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 237,090,474 | 16.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 26,941,002 | 14.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 8,323,620 | 14.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 3,402,375 | 16.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 2,113,154 | 14.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 1,033,879 | 19.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 698,747 | 19.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 373,257 | 14.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 375,896 | 17.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 341,326 | 16.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 256,555 | 14.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 178,686 | 13.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 103,862 | 14.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 159,464 | 19.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 38,822 | 5.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.06% | 27,984 | 17.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 46,336 | 5.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.45% | 82,204 | 14.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 3,922 | 25.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.88% | 6,318 | 26.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.06% | 8,660 | 11.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 31,337 | 0.83% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.47% | 6,648 | 10.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.64% | 5,692 | 7.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.78% | 1,422 | 12.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 71,165 | 13.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 22,286 | 7.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.37% | 1,508 | 29.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.92% | 64,994 | 42.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 19,922 | 8.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 74 | 28.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 16,211 | 21.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12% | 4,947 | 18.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.53% | 332 | 17.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.93% | 29,089 | 11.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 35,815 | 17.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.52% | 622 | 5.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.74% | 40,152 | 36.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.40% | 404 | 81.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.80% | 881 | 28.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.51% | 74 | 100.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.35% | 1,875 | 25.0% |