Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chilean
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.1%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,944,579 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 15.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.71% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chileans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chileans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Chileans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ukraine (15.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Romanian (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and Serbian (15.1%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants from England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chilean Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 21.3% | 48.3% |
| Range | 21.2% | 43.2% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 16.2% |
| Median | 2.5% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 9.6% |
Correlation Details
| Chilean Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 181,669,586 | 18.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 40,738,308 | 14.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 14,802,247 | 14.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 6,242,680 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 3,783,130 | 12.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 2,123,382 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 1,507,231 | 11.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 939,086 | 14.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 624,399 | 13.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.16% | 475,518 | 14.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 295,562 | 12.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 127,126 | 5.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 93,431 | 13.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 108,362 | 10.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 83,824 | 16.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 78,073 | 15.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 24,042 | 22.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 5,952 | 39.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 36,346 | 10.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.40% | 15,299 | 12.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 3,037 | 8.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 14,636 | 5.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 9,056 | 5.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.02% | 16,249 | 19.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 29,211 | 7.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 8,104 | 19.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.35% | 20,448 | 26.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.50% | 2,000 | 29.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.65% | 1,234 | 7.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 3,035 | 34.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 19,239 | 7.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 18,719 | 9.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 14,361 | 13.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 917 | 26.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.68% | 3,943 | 17.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 2,738 | 5.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 1,622 | 33.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.30% | 732 | 10.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.21% | 957 | 48.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.27% | 757 | 17.9% |