Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.4%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 498,768,051 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.143 and weighted average of 15.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from South Eastern Asia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Albanian (15.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Puget Sound Salish (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (15.4%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Portuguese | 91.8 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Irish | 91.5 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 91.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Peruvians | 91.2 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Scottish | 91.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants from Norway | 90.8 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Immigrants from Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants from Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.25% | 3.0% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 54.5% |
Range | 66.4% | 51.5% |
Mean | 17.4% | 15.4% |
Median | 16.6% | 15.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.4% | 17.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.7% | 7.0% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 165,911,454 | 20.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 115,053,627 | 16.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 72,424,950 | 16.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 38,044,598 | 17.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 22,937,053 | 14.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 16,731,944 | 13.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 16,837,329 | 16.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.74% | 8,245,900 | 15.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 6,756,459 | 14.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 5,062,975 | 12.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 4,031,506 | 12.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.75% | 4,593,662 | 16.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.26% | 1,929,031 | 16.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 3,064,423 | 13.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 1,585,107 | 18.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.70% | 2,441,192 | 15.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 1,541,782 | 14.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.74% | 731,455 | 13.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.22% | 1,063,304 | 15.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.72% | 1,322,281 | 11.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30% | 478,395 | 17.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.70% | 1,127,719 | 15.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.19% | 674,264 | 18.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.69% | 445,603 | 14.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.21% | 1,333,344 | 11.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.70% | 386,365 | 14.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.14% | 166,226 | 16.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.74% | 419,626 | 12.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.24% | 52,362 | 17.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.82% | 366,034 | 14.1% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.19% | 294,395 | 13.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.67% | 68,191 | 20.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.36% | 379,408 | 12.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.75% | 343,687 | 14.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.20% | 68,188 | 9.2% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.56% | 37,340 | 16.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.16% | 1,035 | 18.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.92% | 100,898 | 11.1% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.06% | 81,180 | 4.6% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.91% | 13,765 | 19.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.03% | 734 | 54.5% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.83% | 115,162 | 11.5% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.10% | 84,817 | 17.6% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.20% | 140,602 | 10.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.65% | 106,065 | 10.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.16% | 3,800 | 16.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.62% | 110,453 | 14.3% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.26% | 163,403 | 9.9% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.61% | 65,345 | 8.6% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.36% | 213,356 | 15.3% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.62% | 25,902 | 3.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.34% | 52,328 | 21.6% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.65% | 72,605 | 14.2% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.25% | 15,167 | 7.3% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.55% | 47,982 | 13.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.71% | 996 | 18.9% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.40% | 40,738 | 21.7% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.87% | 16,072 | 15.3% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.72% | 47,549 | 17.1% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.24% | 36,657 | 8.9% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.23% | 181,268 | 19.8% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.96% | 9,160 | 6.1% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.06% | 22,622 | 21.4% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.76% | 39,873 | 17.1% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.78% | 4,342 | 4.3% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.69% | 2,996 | 38.0% |