French American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
French American Indian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
French American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
19.2%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
248th/ 347
METRIC RANK
French American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,073,161 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 19.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.45% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of French American Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of French American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if French American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to French American Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to French American Indians are Potawatomi (19.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Cape Verdean (19.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (19.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (19.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Guyana (19.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Americans | 0.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants from Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants from Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
French American Indian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | French American Indian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.024% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 23.6% | 68.1% |
| Range | 23.6% | 65.1% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 26.9% |
| Median | 2.8% | 21.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 36.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 18.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 14.0% |
Correlation Details
| French American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.024% | 124,497,621 | 19.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 4,677,632 | 17.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 1,100,825 | 21.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 319,074 | 15.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 145,605 | 20.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 61,810 | 17.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 124,367 | 25.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 39,407 | 20.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 25,626 | 18.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 12,659 | 19.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 24,077 | 26.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 915 | 68.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 6,621 | 19.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.35% | 12,268 | 21.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.57% | 3,540 | 27.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 362 | 7.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 6,062 | 24.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 2,173 | 3.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.61% | 1,026 | 17.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 595 | 36.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.49% | 178 | 57.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.55% | 682 | 39.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 368 | 17.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 1,236 | 46.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.68% | 387 | 42.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.04% | 3,346 | 37.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.85% | 1,554 | 25.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 1,593 | 48.7% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.23% | 758 | 15.0% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.82% | 578 | 31.4% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.61% | 216 | 24.0% |