Native Hawaiian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,090,370 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 15.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.12% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Native Hawaiians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Native Hawaiians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.050%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (15.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia	90.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Puget Sound Salish	90.1 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants from Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%
Mongolians	89.7 /100 \| #132	Excellent 15.4%
Brazilians	89.6 /100 \| #133	Excellent 15.4%
Immigrants from Spain	89.1 /100 \| #134	Excellent 15.5%
Czechoslovakians	89.0 /100 \| #135	Excellent 15.5%
Native Hawaiians	89.0 /100 \| #136	Excellent 15.5%
South Africans	88.7 /100 \| #137	Excellent 15.5%
Immigrants from Vietnam	88.2 /100 \| #138	Excellent 15.5%
Armenians	87.9 /100 \| #139	Excellent 15.5%
New Zealanders	87.2 /100 \| #140	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants from Jordan	87.2 /100 \| #141	Excellent 15.6%
Canadians	87.1 /100 \| #142	Excellent 15.6%
Immigrants from Peru	86.6 /100 \| #143	Excellent 15.6%

Native Hawaiian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Native Hawaiian Data	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data
Minimum	0.12%	2.4%
Maximum	92.3%	70.0%
Range	92.1%	67.6%
Mean	31.1%	17.7%
Median	27.8%	13.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.1%	8.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	45.0%	22.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	30.9%	13.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	21.4%	13.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	21.3%	13.2%

Correlation Details

Native Hawaiian Percentile	Sample Size	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12%	297,380,304	17.9%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68%	21,511,012	14.1%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17%	4,266,483	14.5%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66%	1,371,287	12.8%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20%	521,265	15.9%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64%	135,180	14.7%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19%	57,247	22.6%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76%	18,619	11.1%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.27%	37,483	19.9%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73%	41,890	10.0%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21%	24,710	19.2%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58%	10,114	11.5%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36%	4,736	12.9%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84%	29,784	9.4%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.16%	4,803	12.5%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.61%	5,345	26.6%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.35%	65,913	8.7%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.92%	6,167	26.1%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.49%	432	61.6%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.60%	29,443	14.2%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30%	16,692	2.4%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92%	4,397	21.4%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.39%	464,382	13.6%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.81%	51,325	5.5%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.39%	102,236	18.5%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86%	101,514	13.2%
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.35%	103,149	6.5%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.67%	127,370	9.6%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.42%	6,419	13.0%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.77%	28,343	10.8%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.25%	162,407	6.5%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.58%	23,407	19.6%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14%	51,321	6.5%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.74%	58,669	11.7%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.30%	3,961	17.0%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85%	117,714	10.3%
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11%	71,880	7.2%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.85%	34,616	4.5%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.35%	95,020	9.9%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.87%	27,423	3.7%
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.22%	21,055	10.7%
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.64%	15,015	18.5%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.34%	10,846	6.0%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.88%	42,734	5.9%
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.43%	3,073	37.1%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.83%	52,848	7.3%
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.16%	6,892	14.6%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.68%	36,062	21.6%
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.76%	11,376	7.0%
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.30%	2,255	8.6%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.78%	26,147	20.0%
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.32%	63,950	13.2%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.81%	9,568	7.6%
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.13%	49,623	11.7%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.71%	30,869	6.5%
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.32%	4,796	54.0%
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.68%	64,496	7.4%
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.63%	3,542	9.7%
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.44%	4,628	19.3%
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.62%	7,704	2.5%
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.34%	2,910	31.9%
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.52%	3,484	7.9%
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.76%	55,163	9.3%
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.32%	5,193	7.8%
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.69%	1,897	9.3%
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.21%	14,310	49.2%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.92%	27,766	12.5%
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.36%	1,463	19.6%
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.28%	5,638	23.0%
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.82%	1,666	57.9%
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.29%	1,972	10.9%
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.95%	50,453	20.8%
[ 39.5% - 40.0% ] 39.66%	49,256	22.8%
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.13%	1,834	4.7%
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.22%	15,863	22.7%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.99%	4,555	13.3%
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.05%	11,029	11.2%
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.27%	3,587	42.7%
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.66%	3,556	42.7%
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.29%	10,042	17.6%
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.76%	17,696	25.9%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.26%	1,096	40.4%
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.76%	3,593	11.0%
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.53%	5,026	14.8%
[ 49.5% - 50.0% ] 49.55%	890	5.4%
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.39%	3,832	21.3%
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.81%	4,366	26.8%
[ 53.0% - 53.5% ] 53.45%	3,686	28.6%
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.72%	3,149	26.6%
[ 57.0% - 57.5% ] 57.46%	731	70.0%
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.72%	17,857	21.5%
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.59%	51,367	24.9%
[ 62.5% - 63.0% ] 62.57%	2,872	17.1%
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.35%	4,827	43.3%
[ 63.5% - 64.0% ] 63.68%	14,129	29.3%
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.30%	902	23.7%
[ 64.5% - 65.0% ] 64.76%	210	21.1%
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.97%	3,553	48.6%
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.63%	10,307	9.9%
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.09%	3,133	6.9%
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.53%	12,370	23.9%
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.96%	2,853	8.7%
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.49%	2,436	8.4%
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.97%	4,475	5.4%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.27%	1,436	3.5%

Native Hawaiian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

COMPARE

Native Hawaiian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16Excellent

Native Hawaiian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Native Hawaiian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Native Hawaiian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Excellent