Alaskan Athabascan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Alaskan Athabascan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
18.3%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,659,111 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 18.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.41% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Alaskan Athabascans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Alaskan Athabascans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (18.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Nicaraguan (18.2%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Africa (18.2%, a difference of 0.87%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Bermudan (18.1%, a difference of 0.97%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants from Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alaskan Athabascan Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.025% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 99.2% |
| Mean | 43.6% | 38.6% |
| Median | 37.8% | 25.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 77.3% | 60.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 69.4% | 45.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 35.3% | 31.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 35.0% | 30.9% |
Correlation Details
| Alaskan Athabascan Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.025% | 44,457,479 | 19.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 221,750 | 12.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 103,787 | 15.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 510,516 | 12.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 152,269 | 16.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 12,416 | 18.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 66,872 | 5.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 3,579 | 18.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 16,935 | 20.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 2,061 | 12.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 29,293 | 3.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 7,921 | 29.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 33,211 | 12.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.94% | 126 | 42.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.49% | 5,321 | 0.83% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.96% | 19,529 | 18.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.13% | 964 | 15.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.01% | 283 | 70.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.52% | 116 | 79.2% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 235 | 14.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.38% | 1,352 | 21.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.57% | 1,167 | 14.1% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.16% | 379 | 25.0% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.49% | 761 | 43.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.65% | 439 | 29.6% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.34% | 1,719 | 31.5% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.20% | 508 | 43.8% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.36% | 73 | 63.6% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.44% | 71 | 63.6% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.00% | 430 | 13.9% |
[ 57.5% - 58.0% ] 57.74% | 1,254 | 6.7% |
[ 65.0% - 65.5% ] 65.45% | 220 | 100.0% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.85% | 41 | 60.0% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.31% | 256 | 100.0% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.43% | 28 | 100.0% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.58% | 190 | 100.0% |
[ 72.5% - 73.0% ] 72.99% | 274 | 59.1% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.94% | 165 | 76.7% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.07% | 270 | 59.1% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.80% | 388 | 27.8% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.31% | 952 | 9.7% |
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.98% | 218 | 26.7% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.46% | 130 | 100.0% |
[ 79.0% - 79.5% ] 79.37% | 252 | 23.2% |
[ 83.0% - 83.5% ] 83.18% | 428 | 14.3% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.26% | 364 | 16.0% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.62% | 420 | 8.7% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.53% | 554 | 31.6% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.24% | 82 | 100.0% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.95% | 398 | 47.1% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.95% | 174 | 50.0% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.28% | 238 | 67.6% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.00% | 201 | 14.3% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 52 | 100.0% |