Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Egyptian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 25-29
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
93.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,865,040 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 85.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.94% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Egyptians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 within an area, or if Egyptians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Switzerland (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Slavic (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Mongolian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Bangladeshi (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Japan (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Immigrants from Korea | 94.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Netherlands | 94.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 94.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 94.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Mongolians | 94.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 94.0 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 93.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Egyptians | 93.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Slavs | 93.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 93.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Zaire | 93.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Hong Kong | 92.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 92.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 92.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants from Austria | 91.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian Data | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Data |
| Minimum | 0.048% | 50.2% |
| Maximum | 19.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 19.1% | 49.8% |
| Mean | 4.3% | 87.4% |
| Median | 3.2% | 86.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 84.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 94.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 9.5% |
Correlation Details
| Egyptian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.048% | 148,561,079 | 84.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 57,349,644 | 85.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 20,138,766 | 84.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 22,787,501 | 84.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 7,456,198 | 85.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 4,831,353 | 85.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 3,225,826 | 86.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 2,417,282 | 86.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 1,790,525 | 86.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 1,982,578 | 85.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 860,367 | 82.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 676,576 | 87.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 775,907 | 86.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 390,678 | 83.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 415,554 | 87.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 513,256 | 82.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 291,026 | 87.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 742,845 | 85.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 262,183 | 88.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 122,074 | 86.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 25,474 | 82.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 77,570 | 90.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 9,255 | 93.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 159,607 | 77.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 145,756 | 85.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 96,434 | 79.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 3,965 | 90.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 77,913 | 86.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 113,727 | 86.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 9,596 | 93.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 5,444 | 74.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 18,673 | 85.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 81 | 72.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 58,053 | 81.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 5,835 | 91.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 60,303 | 86.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 13,070 | 82.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 533 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 36,823 | 95.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 155 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 52,230 | 73.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 4,782 | 63.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 99,800 | 87.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.49% | 601 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 3,553 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 6,952 | 94.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 14,518 | 50.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.59% | 8,410 | 95.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 7,017 | 96.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 140,994 | 86.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 1,155 | 75.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 1,429 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 747 | 100.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.02% | 5,751 | 100.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.44% | 5,000 | 100.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.49% | 1,394 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 241 | 100.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.16% | 981 | 100.0% |