Laotian In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Laotian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 25-29
84.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
16.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,828,229 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.124 and weighted average of 84.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.60% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Laotians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Laotians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 within an area, or if Laotians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Laotians by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Germany (84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Venezuelan (84.4%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Portuguese | 21.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 84.4% |
Immigrants from Israel | 20.8 /100 | #195 | Fair 84.4% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 19.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 84.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 19.3 /100 | #197 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Iraq | 19.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Germany | 18.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 17.5 /100 | #200 | Poor 84.4% |
Laotians | 16.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 84.4% |
Afghans | 15.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Afghanistan | 15.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 84.4% |
Venezuelans | 15.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 84.4% |
Ecuadorians | 14.8 /100 | #205 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Cambodia | 14.3 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Armenia | 13.3 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 13.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 84.4% |
Laotian In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Laotian Data | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Data |
Minimum | 0.051% | 47.5% |
Maximum | 10.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 10.5% | 52.5% |
Mean | 3.3% | 84.0% |
Median | 2.7% | 84.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 78.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 91.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 12.0% |
Correlation Details
Laotian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.051% | 165,554,642 | 84.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 36,388,772 | 85.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 10,259,745 | 84.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 5,495,041 | 83.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 2,238,889 | 83.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 2,036,574 | 84.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 813,243 | 83.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 620,047 | 83.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 177,320 | 87.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 217,307 | 82.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 166,402 | 86.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 158,717 | 81.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 18,184 | 91.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 234,769 | 88.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 45,829 | 87.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.05% | 112,774 | 84.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 59,281 | 68.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 44,033 | 87.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 19,498 | 78.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.55% | 9,634 | 89.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 12,050 | 80.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 51,720 | 86.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 1,246 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.07% | 6,249 | 68.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.20% | 2,466 | 92.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 12,478 | 71.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 1,304 | 98.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 890 | 78.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 4,150 | 78.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 2,123 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 26,556 | 72.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.61% | 1,692 | 98.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 1,392 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 722 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 1,881 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.98% | 23,842 | 73.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.62% | 302 | 52.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 619 | 75.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 2,756 | 69.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 236 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.94% | 1,634 | 47.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.57% | 1,220 | 100.0% |