Japanese In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Japanese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Japanese In Labor Force | Age 25-29
84.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
11.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,141,498 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 84.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Japanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Japanese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 within an area, or if Japanese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Japanese by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Subsaharan African (84.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Lebanese (84.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Syria (84.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (84.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Chinese (84.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Immigrants from Cambodia | 14.3 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Armenia | 13.3 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Indonesia | 13.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants from Jordan | 12.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 84.4% |
Chinese | 12.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 84.3% |
Immigrants from Venezuela | 12.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 84.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 11.7 /100 | #212 | Poor 84.3% |
Japanese | 11.4 /100 | #213 | Poor 84.3% |
Lebanese | 11.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 84.3% |
Immigrants from Syria | 10.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 84.3% |
Israelis | 9.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 84.3% |
Immigrants from Ecuador | 9.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 84.3% |
Immigrants from Nigeria | 9.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 84.3% |
Immigrants from Saudi Arabia | 8.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 84.3% |
Nigerians | 7.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 84.3% |
Japanese In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese Data | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Data |
Minimum | 0.089% | 52.9% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 36.8% | 47.1% |
Mean | 8.3% | 83.1% |
Median | 5.8% | 84.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.9% | 81.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 85.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 7.9% |
Correlation Details
Japanese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.089% | 191,222,414 | 84.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 32,057,853 | 84.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 11,048,737 | 84.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 5,583,989 | 84.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 2,871,139 | 84.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 1,546,807 | 84.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.77% | 1,269,116 | 84.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 537,392 | 83.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 401,596 | 82.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 81,458 | 84.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 184,093 | 85.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 208,256 | 85.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.43% | 147,545 | 80.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.81% | 638,209 | 84.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 60,107 | 85.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.30% | 473,882 | 83.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 68,008 | 82.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 74,695 | 85.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 41,240 | 89.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.33% | 4,728 | 70.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.64% | 104,251 | 80.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 70,567 | 84.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.54% | 65,608 | 83.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.83% | 278 | 52.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.99% | 41,001 | 82.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.63% | 59,153 | 84.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 4,145 | 90.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.85% | 11,764 | 68.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.91% | 11,678 | 67.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.38% | 2,911 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 59,460 | 75.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.92% | 27,848 | 87.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.25% | 2,588 | 82.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.86% | 114,737 | 83.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 987 | 100.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 2,215 | 81.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.30% | 411 | 97.9% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.47% | 868 | 81.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.70% | 1,575 | 88.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.12% | 5,478 | 77.6% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.73% | 32,323 | 87.1% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.86% | 388 | 81.0% |