Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 25-29
85.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,420,999 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 85.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.1% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Italy (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Scotland (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Cameroon (85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Taiwanese (85.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Greeks | 99.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 99.5 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Thais | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Serbians | 99.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Taiwanese | 99.4 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Kenya | 99.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 99.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Cameroon | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Menominee | 99.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Sweden | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Kenyans | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Australia | 98.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 52.9% |
| Maximum | 18.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 18.1% | 47.1% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 88.8% |
| Median | 1.5% | 87.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.75% | 84.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 15.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 10.1% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,946,311 | 85.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 39,414,296 | 85.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,221,197 | 84.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 5,209,777 | 85.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,101,532 | 84.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,516,945 | 84.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,263,015 | 86.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 612,510 | 86.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 435,581 | 81.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 377,327 | 87.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 276,746 | 87.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 287,974 | 88.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 96,067 | 94.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 125,539 | 81.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 73,297 | 90.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 11,853 | 82.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 128,118 | 88.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 38,734 | 86.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 39,657 | 78.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 28,798 | 89.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 19,747 | 87.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 29,269 | 93.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 21,542 | 73.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 31,003 | 73.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 8,190 | 100.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,723 | 92.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 3,104 | 100.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 10,027 | 90.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 902 | 100.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 27,614 | 93.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 5,413 | 78.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 782 | 100.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.90% | 999 | 100.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 2,500 | 85.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 2,854 | 68.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,460 | 81.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 67.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,317 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 210 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,763 | 52.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 100.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.63% | 418 | 100.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,686 | 100.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 3,664 | 74.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 5,795 | 95.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 417 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 1,272 | 87.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 995 | 84.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 115 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 197 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 84.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 346 | 100.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.13% | 364 | 100.0% |