Kiowa Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Kiowa
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Kiowa Births to Unmarried Women
43.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,598,383 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 43.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Kiowa and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Kiowa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Kiowa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Native/Alaskan (43.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Chippewa (42.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Paiute (42.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (42.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and Tsimshian (42.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 44.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 44.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 45.3% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 45.7% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 46.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 47.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 48.2% |
Kiowa Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.014% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 19.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 19.2% | 94.4% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 53.3% |
| Median | 2.1% | 46.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.81% | 33.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.1% | 77.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 43.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 25.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 24.5% |
Correlation Details
| Kiowa Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.014% | 52,956,252 | 33.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 1,373,408 | 32.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 564,904 | 28.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 294,031 | 40.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 81,796 | 47.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 41,151 | 39.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 105,854 | 48.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 98,012 | 46.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 8,224 | 77.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 1,713 | 44.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 1,927 | 32.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 21,911 | 33.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 21,755 | 68.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 1,065 | 5.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.30% | 1,088 | 80.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 783 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 1,263 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 961 | 63.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.95% | 949 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.32% | 1,377 | 33.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,526 | 44.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.02% | 499 | 30.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 292 | 42.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 1,585 | 50.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.91% | 2,301 | 50.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.54% | 8,033 | 84.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.20% | 5,723 | 82.9% |