Kiowa In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Kiowa
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Kiowa In Labor Force | Age > 16
62.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,099,156 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.180 and weighted average of 62.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.22% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Kiowa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Kiowa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Chickasaw (62.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Arapaho (62.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Yakama (62.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Yup'ik (62.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and American (62.1%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 63.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 63.2% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
Kiowa In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Kiowa Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.014% | 31.8% |
Maximum | 25.9% | 67.3% |
Range | 25.9% | 35.5% |
Mean | 5.4% | 56.9% |
Median | 3.0% | 58.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 52.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 62.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 7.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 7.2% |
Correlation Details
Kiowa Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.014% | 53,191,054 | 66.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 1,500,870 | 63.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 603,478 | 64.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 340,723 | 63.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 91,763 | 56.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 43,569 | 62.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 111,877 | 60.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 3,059 | 57.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 117,253 | 62.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 9,935 | 57.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 1,713 | 53.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 4,747 | 67.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 21,911 | 59.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 176 | 58.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 22,810 | 46.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.07% | 1,065 | 51.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.17% | 1,196 | 53.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 1,613 | 59.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68% | 783 | 67.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.88% | 800 | 49.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.14% | 542 | 51.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.56% | 478 | 44.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 1,613 | 53.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 166 | 59.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 961 | 58.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.68% | 278 | 66.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 1,207 | 51.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.36% | 373 | 49.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.32% | 1,377 | 55.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.59% | 1,154 | 52.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,526 | 54.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.02% | 499 | 56.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.09% | 176 | 67.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 292 | 58.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.31% | 1,585 | 50.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.91% | 2,301 | 50.4% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.16% | 396 | 31.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.54% | 8,033 | 58.5% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.20% | 5,723 | 58.1% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.93% | 81 | 66.2% |