Yakama Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Yakama
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Yakama Births to Unmarried Women
40.3%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,190,199 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090 and weighted average of 40.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.15% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Yakama and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Yakama influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Yakama simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Yakama by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Crow (40.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bahamas (40.1%, a difference of 0.56%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (40.1%, a difference of 0.62%), Bahamian (40.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and Apache (39.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 39.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 39.7% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 39.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 39.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 39.9% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.1% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.4% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 40.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 41.0% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
Yakama Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
Minimum | 0.032% | 24.7% |
Maximum | 56.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.5% | 75.3% |
Mean | 9.3% | 64.6% |
Median | 3.3% | 67.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 38.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 87.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 49.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 27.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 26.3% |
Correlation Details
Yakama Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.032% | 18,490,380 | 31.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 501,064 | 35.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 58,592 | 31.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 25,312 | 43.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 4,142 | 87.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 3,140 | 86.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 13,697 | 56.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 43,684 | 38.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,435 | 66.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 659 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 1,024 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.40% | 736 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.39% | 569 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 3,153 | 27.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 11,112 | 55.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 13,015 | 24.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.64% | 220 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.38% | 1,195 | 76.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.87% | 640 | 73.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.73% | 13,145 | 45.4% |
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.39% | 1,724 | 72.7% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.51% | 561 | 69.2% |