Cajun Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Cajun
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Cajun Births to Unmarried Women
41.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,039,196 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.202 and weighted average of 41.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.3% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Cajuns and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Cajuns influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Cajuns simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Cajuns by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Sioux (41.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Bahamian (40.8%, a difference of 0.49%), Cape Verdean (41.3%, a difference of 0.87%), Cheyenne (41.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and Immigrants from Cuba (41.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 39.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 39.9% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.1% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.3% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 40.4% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 40.8% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 41.3% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 42.5% |
Cajun Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 25.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.4% | 96.0% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 54.7% |
| Median | 4.2% | 47.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 34.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.9% | 76.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 42.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 27.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 27.2% |
Correlation Details
| Cajun Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 127,843,535 | 32.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 7,954,345 | 32.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 2,969,485 | 40.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 1,020,635 | 48.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 657,283 | 36.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 610,822 | 34.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 442,068 | 41.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 318,561 | 36.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 312,816 | 47.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 136,237 | 39.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 109,555 | 25.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 158,405 | 33.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 117,650 | 57.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 71,462 | 76.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 134,997 | 43.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 171,504 | 37.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 106,966 | 64.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 35,946 | 36.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 68,826 | 41.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 53,669 | 37.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 111,321 | 35.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 46,761 | 39.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.84% | 5,526 | 64.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 34,735 | 57.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 97,407 | 47.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 107,443 | 56.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 56,260 | 58.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 538 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 16,526 | 34.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.92% | 791 | 28.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.00% | 23,382 | 16.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 6,498 | 51.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 24,683 | 29.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 10,648 | 87.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.96% | 6,507 | 72.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 19,497 | 50.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.38% | 2,474 | 59.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.55% | 4,162 | 4.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.70% | 386 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86% | 5,306 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 7,223 | 85.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.32% | 5,842 | 29.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 16,937 | 57.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.90% | 9,823 | 50.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 11,726 | 92.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 30,530 | 69.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 4,335 | 100.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,347 | 100.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 1,069 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.05% | 2,422 | 29.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.32% | 2,633 | 29.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.50% | 13,329 | 41.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.78% | 1,766 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29% | 915 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.43% | 23,891 | 33.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.64% | 1,473 | 100.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 1,518 | 4.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.69% | 8,271 | 41.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.06% | 5,423 | 78.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.52% | 191 | 100.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.55% | 1,147 | 100.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.06% | 9,326 | 58.4% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.47% | 1,441 | 12.5% |