Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,326,129 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 42.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.54% in percentage of births to unmarried women.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chippewa and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chippewa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Chippewa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Births to Unmarried Women

In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Paiute (42.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Native/Alaskan (43.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (42.2%, a difference of 1.0%), Tsimshian (42.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Kiowa (43.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Births to Unmarried Women
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #323	Tragic 41.0%
Cape Verdeans	0.0 /100 \| #324	Tragic 41.3%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #325	Tragic 41.3%
Immigrants from Cuba	0.0 /100 \| #326	Tragic 41.5%
Tsimshian	0.0 /100 \| #327	Tragic 42.2%
Immigrants from Cabo Verde	0.0 /100 \| #328	Tragic 42.2%
Paiute	0.0 /100 \| #329	Tragic 42.5%
Chippewa	0.0 /100 \| #330	Tragic 42.6%
Natives/Alaskans	0.0 /100 \| #331	Tragic 43.0%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #332	Tragic 43.1%
Blacks/African Americans	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 44.3%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 44.4%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 45.3%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 45.7%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 46.6%

Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chippewa Data	Births to Unmarried Women Data
Minimum	0.064%	10.0%
Maximum	98.7%	100.0%
Range	98.7%	90.0%
Mean	39.8%	71.0%
Median	28.1%	75.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	10.6%	45.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.0%	100.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	56.3%	54.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	32.0%	27.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	31.8%	27.7%

Correlation Details

Chippewa Percentile	Sample Size	Births to Unmarried Women
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.064%	196,523,235	32.8%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70%	5,520,328	34.3%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15%	1,670,335	35.2%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73%	359,800	36.7%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21%	349,819	33.0%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62%	279,407	30.6%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26%	111,462	37.7%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71%	71,657	41.3%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.37%	68,528	52.4%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65%	28,683	59.8%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19%	17,698	36.8%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.73%	12,135	56.3%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.29%	1,255	76.5%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76%	6,069	64.6%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34%	13,847	39.8%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.87%	19,115	55.4%
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.42%	5,156	84.2%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.60%	2,699	72.9%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.35%	39,509	45.9%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.26%	14,207	49.6%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.64%	35,578	49.9%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.45%	17,994	57.7%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.92%	856	100.0%
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.70%	7,320	70.6%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.19%	7,188	53.6%
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.74%	1,871	25.0%
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65%	16,808	32.1%
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.13%	1,976	43.1%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.61%	18,905	16.4%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.76%	16,587	28.6%
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.13%	2,020	58.8%
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.08%	4,309	42.2%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.55%	1,601	100.0%
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.68%	3,104	45.5%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.20%	99	100.0%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.48%	258	100.0%
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.69%	908	100.0%
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.56%	3,290	42.2%
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.03%	795	75.0%
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.93%	3,628	95.0%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.90%	3,549	95.5%
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.12%	2,233	100.0%
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.01%	918	81.0%
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.44%	6,234	39.1%
[ 41.5% - 42.0% ] 41.67%	96	100.0%
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.90%	1,275	63.6%
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.65%	575	100.0%
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.98%	3,079	52.8%
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.68%	1,819	56.3%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.27%	858	10.0%
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.82%	1,838	82.4%
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.84%	6,540	88.5%
[ 49.0% - 49.5% ] 49.39%	494	100.0%
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.53%	1,011	100.0%
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.88%	2,969	79.5%
[ 54.0% - 54.5% ] 54.37%	607	64.3%
[ 55.5% - 56.0% ] 55.80%	776	100.0%
[ 57.5% - 58.0% ] 57.97%	395	60.0%
[ 62.5% - 63.0% ] 62.62%	1,228	100.0%
[ 63.5% - 64.0% ] 63.76%	1,228	100.0%
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.71%	525	50.0%
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.47%	683	100.0%
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.98%	733	100.0%
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.82%	2,940	31.9%
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.74%	613	100.0%
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.43%	219	100.0%
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.29%	1,026	100.0%
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.56%	2,117	83.0%
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.88%	323	100.0%
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.39%	459	48.3%
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.78%	472	100.0%
[ 83.5% - 84.0% ] 83.68%	190	100.0%
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.28%	318	100.0%
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.67%	285	100.0%
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.40%	2,071	93.8%
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.28%	792	100.0%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.31%	39	100.0%
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.90%	7,355	100.0%
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.16%	2,960	100.0%
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.75%	1,011	100.0%
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.42%	852	100.0%
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.17%	1,202	100.0%
[ 98.5% - 99.0% ] 98.73%	1,183	100.0%

Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women

COMPARE

Chippewa Births to Unmarried WomenTragic

Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Births to Unmarried Women

Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Chippewa Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic